Why Financial Advisers Are Too Professional to Really Use Social Media

by on August 28, 2009

overdressedatbeachSocial media is an incredibly powerful tool to facilitate communication and build financial services practices through expert content marketing.  It’s not about trendy technologies or how many Facebook friends you have.  It’s about having the right voice online and building a community of people around that online presence. Most financial advisers who have made the plunge into content marketing online are flailing because they’re just too darn professional.

Sound strange?  Why would someone fail because they’re being too professional?  I’ll explain.

First of all, content marketing is the practice of using content to lure new clients and retail old ones.  Financial advisers should be well aware of this technique offline.  Gurus like Ken Fisher have used books, Forbes columns, seminar materials, and white papers for years to lure clients and build practices with billions of dollars under management.

It works like this:

  • Decide what your target clients look like and what they would be interested in reading about
  • Develop a piece of content — it could be anything from a magazine article to a free ebook to a subscription investment newsletter
  • Give a breadcrumb to the prospect/reader so he can contact you in the future
  • Get some contact info so you can proactively reach out to the prospect/reader

So, how does this typically work?  The adviser hires someone — could be in-house or outsourced to a marketing firm — and the process begins.  That’s how it works offline.  This is classic business school case: a service provider outsources their work to someone specialized in their profession.  It’s symbiotic — the financial professional focuses on investing and the marketing pro does his/her magic.  This Ricardian specialization optimizes service levels and provides a better product.

While I’m not advocating scrapping marketing relationships, this doesn’t work online.  Content marketing — using content to attract prospects — requires more active participation.  Some have called social media, “participation media”.  That’s not a bad description.  What worked for years offline (still does by the way) doesn’t necessarily translate online.

Online readers and potential clients are looking to connect with a financial personality, not just a one-off article.  Advisers who want to play in this game need to understand the rules.  They want to know what how an adviser thinks and how he arrives at those thoughts.  This is more like a constant stream of content in various formats — blogs articles and short form messaging, like Twitter — than like running a monthly article in a magazine.

If you do — and Sean Hannon does — you’ll reap the benefits of a steady stream of high-quality prospects and even retain existing clients because you’ve created an ongoing communications channel.

  • PatAllen
    Good post, Zack. We, too, observe a difference between the quality of engagement of financial advisors who are using Twitter to have ongoing conversations and those who seek to use Twitter as a platform from which to broadcast.

    In general, Twitter has a way of exposing users intent on exploiting it as a marketing channel. We agree that the arms-length approach to posting, which you describe, ultimately falls flat--for both the Twitter-user and follower.

    But, plenty of advisors are using Twitter to provide a never-before transparency about their influences and their reactions as the business day unfolds. Their followers benefit--not from investment advice, which, of course, they're prohibited from providing--but from the added insights. More conversation deepens a relationship, and that's what Twitter enables for advisors willing to embrace this way of communicating.

    It's all good, see you on Twitter!

    @RockTheBoatMKTG
  • newrulesofinvesting
    Thanks for the comment, Pat. You are totally right.
    It wasn't my intention to say that all advisers are failing to use Twitter correctly, but rather to draw attention to the fact and suggest an alternative.

    It's all about the conversation.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post: Interview with John Schroy, thought leader in collaborative investment research (Part 2)

Next post: Covestor’s Most-Bought-Stocks smokin’ it