<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MSN StockScouter beats SP500 handily YTD in 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newrulesofinvesting.com/2008/07/31/msn-stock-scout-beats-sp500-handily-ytd-in-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newrulesofinvesting.com/2008/07/31/msn-stock-scout-beats-sp500-handily-ytd-in-2008/</link>
	<description>helping investors make better investment decisions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 10:43:58 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mlgreen8753</title>
		<link>http://newrulesofinvesting.com/2008/07/31/msn-stock-scout-beats-sp500-handily-ytd-in-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-606</link>
		<dc:creator>mlgreen8753</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 23:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newrulesofinvesting.wordpress.com/?p=129#comment-606</guid>
		<description>I like your analogy of the blender.  That&#039;s describes perfectly how many of these so-called algorithms work.  People must face the reality that stocks are risky and you can do some common sense analysis, but it is what it is...risky.  Right now I&#039;m considering stock in Mentor Capital (MNTR), because of persuasive financial statements released at &lt;a href=&quot;http://breastcancerinvesting.com/investor_call.shtml&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Breast Cancer Investing&lt;/a&gt;, but it would mostly be because of my intuition that the breast cancer research being conducted by their merger company will drive the stocks value up once it makes it to market.  The bottom line is, an educated risk is still a risk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like your analogy of the blender.  That&#39;s describes perfectly how many of these so-called algorithms work.  People must face the reality that stocks are risky and you can do some common sense analysis, but it is what it is&#8230;risky.  Right now I&#39;m considering stock in Mentor Capital (MNTR), because of persuasive financial statements released at <a href="http://breastcancerinvesting.com/investor_call.shtml" rel="nofollow">Breast Cancer Investing</a>, but it would mostly be because of my intuition that the breast cancer research being conducted by their merger company will drive the stocks value up once it makes it to market.  The bottom line is, an educated risk is still a risk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
